CMA Study Group

 View Only
  • 1.  CMA Part 2: depriciation FI-Rpeorting purpose vs tax purpose

    Posted 02-24-2019 05:02 AM

    Hi all,

     

    I have the task from IMA support Package with following information:

     

    "<..> New equipment will be purchased for $1,200,000 and cost $300,000 to install. The equipment will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over 5 years for financial reporting purposes and 3 years for tax purposes. At the end of the fifth year, it will cost $100,000 to remove the equipment, which can be sold for $300,000.  <..> In a capital budgeting analysis, what is the expected cash flow at time = 5 (fifth year of operations) that firm should use to compute the net present value?"

     

    In the sample solution from IMA tax shield is added and calculated as follows:

    Tax shield [($1,500,000 - $300,000) ÷ 3] x .4 = 160,000

     

    But: we need the CF for the 5th year/period, from the tax point of view after 3 years the equipment is fully depreciated, no further depreciations in 4th and 5th period.

    As a result no tax shield possible for 4th and 5th periods?

     

    2. question: why they deduct 300 k USD? The equipment could be sold for 300 k USD, but there is also retirements costs of 100 k USD à salvage value is just 200 k USD.

     

    Please, help a confused German CMA – candidate  ��

     

    Best regards

    Natalia

     

     

     

     



  • 2.  RE: CMA Part 2: depriciation FI-Rpeorting purpose vs tax purpose

    Posted 02-25-2019 07:50 PM
    The $300,000 is the salvage value, the $100,000 is a distraction because the purchaser could be responsible for the cost to uninstall the equipment. You did give the the DCF rate so I cannot help you any further, also the cash flow should be calculated over five years for financial accounting

    ------------------------------
    Deon Denton
    Accountant
    Philadelphia PA
    United States
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: CMA Part 2: depriciation FI-Rpeorting purpose vs tax purpose

    Posted 02-26-2019 10:48 AM
    Hi Natalia,

    I believe you are correct in challenging the tax shield provided in the answer explanation. There are two offsetting mistakes in the answer explanation. One is that they are taxing the return of working capital, reducing the $400K to $240K, (a decrease $160k). The return of working capital is not a taxable event. However the explanation also provides a depreciation tax shield for year 5, for which there should not be a tax shield, as the equipment was fully depreciated by the end of year 3. This tax shield provided in the answer explanation happens to be $160K, which corrects the mistake of taxing the return of working capital. 

    So you still get the correct answer of $1,120,000 ad the cash flow in year 5, the explanation is just wrong unfortunately. Nice catch!

    Kyle


  • 4.  RE: CMA Part 2: depriciation FI-Rpeorting purpose vs tax purpose

    Posted 02-26-2019 11:35 AM
    You are also correct in your second question regarding subtracting the $300K salvage value from the depreciable base.  This should not occur for tax purposes and therefore should not be factored when determining the tax shield.


  • 5.  RE: CMA Part 2: depriciation FI-Rpeorting purpose vs tax purpose

    Posted 03-14-2019 12:22 PM
    Kyle, Thank you very much for clarification and explanation!
    Yes, tataxing the return of working capital was second thing that made me crazy :D

    P.S. Today I got an email, that I passed Part 1(-:
    Waiting for the result of Part 2 now... Waiting for results is almost as difficult as learning for exam :D

    ------------------------------
    Natalia Menzel
    Student
    Bad Hindelang
    Germany
    ------------------------------